So after peer-reviewing Phoebe Clark's journal for last week and writing a post about it, we did another journal entry in class for each journal we reviewed. It was basically the list out the strengths and weaknesses on the project we reviewed.
Strengths:
1. The student was very dedicated to researching the project, and had a lot of work and write-ups to show for it in her journal since her project involved a lot of it.
2. She also reached out to many different scientists and researchers in the area, including local businesses and Cornell professors.
3. She had some good pictures and charts in her journal, and even though they were few and far between, they were all very impressive and detailed.
Weaknesses:
As a precursor, Phoebe's journal and project was amazing, and only had a couple of nit-picky things.
1. The topic was really hard to understand; from what I could tell it was a college-level bio project for a high school senior
2. She said she didn't do what she intended to, but in the end almost accomplished her main goal and learned a lot more than she expected to in the end
3. Her handwriting was a little difficult to read in some places like it was rushed
No comments:
Post a Comment